MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115261588

Brenda Dunn-Lardeau (dir.). Ouvrages phares de la Réforme et de la Contre-Réforme dans les collections montréalaises. Québec, Presses de l’université du Québec, 2014

2015· other· fr· W7115261588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) · 2015
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Section (typography)Limiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lemaitre Jean-Loup. Brenda Dunn-Lardeau (dir.). Ouvrages phares de la Réforme et de la Contre-Réforme dans les collections montréalaises. Québec, Presses de l’université du Québec, 2014. In: Revue d'histoire de l'Église de France, tome 101, n°247, 2015. p. 464.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)French-language works237,207