MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115281480

36 Laajan reservin hyöty maanpuolustuksen tukena

2023· other· fi· W7115281480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDoria (University of Helsinki) · 2023
Typeother
Languagefi
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecret ballotQuarter (Canadian coin)Ethnic group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miten laajaa reserviä voitaisiin hyödyntää tehokkaammin tulevaisuudessa? Entä millaisia esimerkkejä vastaavasta toiminnasta löytyy muualta maailmasta? Muuttunut turvallisuustilanne on herättänyt keskustelua reserviläisten hyödyntämisestä maanpuolustuksen tukena. Miten se voitaisiin toteuttaa tehokkaasti ja turvallisesti? Jaksossa sotilasprofessori Marko Palokankaan vieraana asiaa on mukana pohtimassa Suomen Sotilas -lehden päätoimittaja Jaakko Puuperä. Jakso on neljäs osa kymmenosaista podcast-sarjaa, jossa sotilasprofessori Marko Palokangas syventyy eri alojen huippuasiantuntijoiden kanssa sodankäynnin laaja-alaiseen luonteeseen. Sodankäynti mielletään usein aseiden tai asevoimien väliseksi kamppailuksi, mutta entistä enemmän sodan rintamat ovat muualla kuin varsinaisissa taisteluissa. Nykypäivänä sotaa käydään niin informaatio- ja kyberulottuvuudessa, rahoitusmarkkinoilla kuin myös ihmisten mielissä.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.142

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDoria (University of Helsinki)French-language works237,207