Socio-Ecological Conservation in the Architecture of Kampung Adat Dukuh: A Critical Study Approach Based on Lawrence and Barrie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study discusses socio-ecological conservation in the architecture of Kampung Adat Dukuh through a critical review of the theories of Roderick J. Lawrence (2000) and Thomas Barrie (2017). Kampung Adat Dukuh, as a cultural heritage site, has interrelated ecological and social values that play an important role in the sustainability of the ecosystem and local culture. However, modernization and development pressures threaten the sustainability of its architecture and socio-ecological harmony. This study employs a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, field observations, documentation, and thematic and critical data analysis. The research findings indicate that architectural conservation in the Dukuh Traditional Village must balance traditional values and contemporary development needs while simultaneously considering ecological and social dimensions. Lawrence and Barrie's study emphasizes the importance of a holistic and dialogical approach in cultural and ecological conservation. The implications of this research provide strategic recommendations for adaptive and sustainable traditional village preservation policies in the modern era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".