UnMuted: Defining SARS-CoV-2 lineages according to temporally consistent mutation clusters in wastewater samples
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 lineages are defined according to placement in a phylogenetic tree, but approximated by a list of mutations based on sequences collected from clinical sampling. Wastewater lineage abundance is generally found under the assumption that the mutation frequency is approximately equal to the sum of the abundances of the lineages to which it belongs. By leveraging numerous samples collected over time, I am able to estimate the temporal trends of the abundance of lineages as well as the definitions of those lineages. This is accomplished by assuming that collections of mutations that appear together over time can be used to define lineages. Three main models are considered: One that does not imposes a temporal structure, one that includes an explicit temporal component but allows for missing lineages, and one with an explicit temporal component that attempts to estimate all lineages. It is found that the temporal trend of estimated lineage definitions approximately corresponds to the trend of lineage definitions determined by clinical samples, despite having no information from clinical samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it