Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les années 1950, l’idée de recourir à la notation pour observer, préserver et analyser la danse a suscité l’intérêt de nombreux chercheurs en ethnologie et en anthropologie de la danse. Toutefois, cette démarche reste encore largement marginale. L’autrice, spécialiste en cinétographie Laban, analyse les raisons de cette situation et propose, à partir d’exemples tirés de ses propres recherches, de nouvelles perspectives pour intégrer cet outil dans les études ethnologiques et anthropologiques de la danse. Elle souligne l'importance d'examiner les caractéristiques formelles du mouvement dansé, ainsi que certains éléments corporels parfois perçus comme secondaires ou éphémères, car ils peuvent s’avérer essentiels pour décrypter les dynamiques qui structurent les relations sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it