MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115595320 · doi:10.63332/joph.v4i2.3789

Public Health Approaches to Infection Control in Intensive Care Units

2024· article· W7115595320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Posthumanism · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfection controlPublic healthHealth careIntensive carePopulationTransmission (telecommunications)Control (management)Scope (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are critical care areas with increased infection control requirements as they have populations particularly vulnerable to Health-Care Associated Infections (HCAIs). Prevention of these infections is difficult due to patient comorbidities, antimicrobial use, and increased contact with healthcare workers. A public health approach to infection control uses the control of transmission as an exemplar to demonstrate how a population focus can benefit infection control and prevention in ICUs, extending the scope of practice for nurses. Infection control is a field involved in defining and managing risk factors for infection and is regarded as a key method to interrupt HCAIs in ICUs, emphasizing the need for extractable generalizable principles and avoidance of facility reliance (Datta et al., 2014). Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) provide general guidelines on infection control with a population focus. The role for nursing in ICUs includes remaining up-to-date with these guidelines and emphasizing leadership and advocacy roles to benefit patients by implementing effective infection control strategies (see subsequent sections for details of nursing responsibilities). Environmental analyses offer the potential to help reduce the risk of HCAIs in ICUs by indentifying locations with a greater risk of contamination. The use of diagnostics and autopsies, frequently under-utilized in developing countries where risk is often higher, also provides the opportunity to improve patient safety for individuals with HCAIs. Given these challenges, large-scale multicentre studies are required to determine the extent of HCAIs in these regions and to encourage the implementation of basic infection control measures. In India, specific problems are complicated by the increased incidence of infections within the community, which leads to the rapid colonization of resistant bacteria following admission to an ICU. Efforts to decrease morbidity and mortality also need to address the wider community and historical National Laboratory Surveillance data suggest a current increase in antibiotic resistance across Europe. In the ICU, the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and the primary cause of excess mortality underscore the need for continued antibiotic development. The example of European influenza points to the lasting effects of staffing and healthcare provision on HCAI in ICUs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.318
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.036 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it