MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115598028 · doi:10.5194/ica-abs-10-332-2025

Seeing through Satellites, Streets and Stories: Assessing Nature-Based Solutions in the Santa Rosa-Silang Watershed, Philippines

2025· article· en· W7115598028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsVancouver Community CollegeUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of the Philippines
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Agency (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in rapidly urbanizing cities in the Global South remains underexplored (Pusks et al., 2021;Wolff et al., 2022), particularly in emerging cities where unchecked growth, fragmented governance, and limited institutional capacity exacerbate vulnerability to climate risks and environmental degradation (Adelina et al., 2021;Yasmin et al., 2023).NBS can mitigate flooding, water scarcity and heat island effects, while also providing critical ecological benefits like habitat restoration, pollution reduction, and enhanced biodiversity -when implemented with careful attention to local contexts.Yet, in many Global South contexts effective NBS planning is complicated when external climate finance and expertise overshadows local priorities and, as a consequence, may exacerbate inequalities (Sharma et al.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it