Du Vocabulaire de Marc et Philippe au Dictionnaire Acajun de Marc à Paul à Jos : entreprises populaires de description du parler de la Baie Sainte-Marie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First published in 1988, Le Parler de la Baie Sainte-Marie: le vocabulaire de Marc et Philippe by Félix Thibodeau forms part of a collective, amateur, and deliberate effort to distinguish the variety of French spoken in southwestern Nova Scotia. Similar to other initiatives that linguists have described as instances of folk metalanguage (Preston 2004), Le Parler de la Baie Sainte-Marie and subsequent works contribute to the construction of this variety, setting it apart from other forms of Acadian French and codifying certain features as specific to the region (Johnstone 2006). Through what Asif Agha (2005: 38) terms a process of “enregisterment,” these features come to symbolize the Acadian identity and culture of Baie Sainte-Marie. To better understand how particular linguistic traits have come to be regarded as emblematic of the variety now known as acadjonne, this article analyzes four popular initiatives of linguistic description published in the region since 1976.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".