MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115681786 · doi:10.4000/15cx3

Les coulisses de la villa Médicis à la lumière des archives de l’Académie de France à Rome

2025· book-chapter· fr· W7115681786 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut national d’histoire de l’art eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Middle AgesHistoriographyPower (physics)Indigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis 2017, l’Académie de France à Rome verse aux Archives nationales les documents produits dans le cadre de son fonctionnement, directorat après directorat. Pour des raisons liées à l’histoire moderne de Rome et à ses relations parfois tumultueuses avec la France, ces archives concernent les époques postérieures à 17951, date à laquelle l’Académie de France à Rome, réfugiée à Paris, engage une réforme d’enverg

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’Institut national d’histoire de l’art eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207