MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115682463 · doi:10.1504/ijics.2026.150534

Designing secure image retrieval with SKDTree and security protocols

2025· article· en· W7115682463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information and Computer Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage retrievalSearch engine indexingCloud computingVisual WordFeature extractionImage (mathematics)Invariant (physics)Feature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rise of cloud computing, traditional image retrieval techniques struggle to handle the explosive growth of image data. This study proposes a secure image retrieval method based on the secure KD-tree, integrating scale invariant feature transform for feature extraction and secure interaction protocols for encryption. Experimental results show that the improved SKDTree algorithm achieves a retrieval time of 48 ms for file 1, outperforming the spectral encoding-based subgraph indexing (62 ms) and graph isomorphism (59 ms) algorithms. Additionally, processing 40 images takes 48.63 s, significantly faster than the 68.36 s required by the spectral encoding-based approach. These findings demonstrate that the proposed method ensures efficient and accurate image retrieval. The study contributes to secure multi-server collaboration, enhancing retrieval performance in large-scale cloud environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it