Analysis of the district system of physical culture and sports (on the example of Petrogradsky District of Saint Petersburg)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of the district system of physical culture and sports (using the Petrogradsky District of Saint Petersburg as an example) in creating conditions for engaging in health-improving physical activities. Research methods and organization. Methods of systematizing legal documents, analyzing scientific and methodological literature on the research topic; studying and summarizing statistical observation materials according to Form 1-FK for the period 2019-2023 in the Petrogradsky District of St. Petersburg regarding the organization of physical culture and health-improving activities in organizations of various departmental affiliations were used. Research results and conclusions. It has been identified that the district system of physical culture and sports is a dynamically developing social system. The main indicators of its functioning show positive trends. Within the framework of the district system of physical culture and sports, a variety of physical culture and sports services are provided by organizations and institutions to different population groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it