MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115690127 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-0538

CONSIDERING THE GROUND MOTION SPECTRAL SHAPE THROUGH A COLLAPSE ADJUSTMENT METHOD IN WESTERN CANADA

2025· article· en· W7115690127 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenSeesSubductionGround motionSpectral shape analysisSeismic hazardSpectral accelerationIntensity (physics)Incremental Dynamic AnalysisPeak ground acceleration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most significant properties of ground motions that is highly correlated with the nonlinear response of structures is the spectral shape. One common approach to account for the spectral shape effect is to adjust the collapse intensity of structures by establishing a relationship between the collapse intensity and a direct or indirect indicator of the spectral shape. The majority of the studies conducted on collapse adjustment procedures have focused on building structures located in the Western United States and designed according to the relevant building codes. Application of these procedures to Canada, which has diverse seismic events (ranging from the crustal earthquakes of the stable North American continental region in the East to the active crustal and Cascadia subduction events in the West), requires further investigation. In this study, a number of multi-story reinforced concrete buildings with various fundamental periods and ductility capacities in Western Canada are designed according to the relevant Canadian standards and modeled with the OpenSees software. Using the incremental dynamic analysis, the relationship between the collapse intensity of the structures and the spectral shape of different types of ground motions is investigated and compared with those available in the literature for regions with similar seismic hazard properties. According to the results, due to the inherent differences between the spectral shape of crustal and subduction ground motions within both the short- and long-period ranges of the response spectrum and the remarkably longer duration of the interface records, it is necessary to use event-specific collapse adjustment approaches for seismic assessment of building structures in Western Canada. The effect of using different spectral shape indicators on the collapse assessment results obtained from a recently developed unified seismic performance-based assessment procedure is also investigated. It is expected that the results of this study will help to better understand the necessity of accounting for the spectral shape effect in Canada and determine the application range of existing collapse adjustment methods to building structures with different ductility capacities and configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it