MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115696265 · doi:10.4000/15cxf

Amitiés fécondes : les envois d’Alexis Axilette au prisme des textes et de la photographie

2025· book-chapter· fr· W7115696265 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut national d’histoire de l’art eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoseSubject (documents)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N’est-il pas curieux de constater que, parmi les envois de cette année, les œuvres où s’accuse la plus flagrante médiocrité sont précisément celles dont les auteurs paraissent s’être surtout préoccupés de rompre avec la tradition classique, et où l’intention “moderniste” s’affirme le plus, sous couleur d’indépendance et d’originalité ? Dans la posture où M. Axilette a posé une Diane qui semble défier toutes les lois de la statique, peut-on voir autre chose q

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’Institut national d’histoire de l’art eBooksSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207