Perceptions of New Speakers of Ukrainian Before and After the Full-Scale Invasion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines how the ideologies of the teaching of Ukrainian have shifted on the spectrum of purity/impurity since the beginning of the full-scale war. It analyzes Soviet teacher education materials and textbooks, Ukrainian textbooks, assessment materials, and online language courses before and after the 2022 full-scale invasion. It asks how state and non-state language education institutions approached learners and new speakers of Ukrainian before and after February 2022. The analysis is rooted in historical institutionalist scholarship that considers language ideologies contingent on institutional legacies. It shows that the purist language ideology in Ukraine can be traced to the Soviet Union and that formal language-teaching institutions have been slow to overcome it. It also shows that the full-scale war has weakened purism in non-state Ukrainian language teaching, where overcoming Soviet institutional legacies was easier. Increasing tolerance to nonstandard language signals increasing openness to the diverse ways Ukrainian can be spoken and Ukrainian identity performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it