MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115707263 · doi:10.25976/dgx6-1f31

Arctic River Delta Experiment (ARDEX) water quality, 2004.

2025· dataset· en· W7115707263 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDataStream · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticPermafrostEstuaryRiver deltaDeltaSubmarine pipelineWater qualityColored dissolved organic matterHydrology (agriculture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic River Delta EXperiment (ARDEX) was a 2004 satellite program of the CASES (Canada Arctic Shelf Exchange Study) program designed to extend offshore measurements of CASES into the freshwater-saltwater transition zone of the Mackenzie River estuary and delta. The objectives of ARDEX were to evaluate the properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the river and coastal waters, and the photochemical, geochemical and biological processes regulating DOM dynamics. This dataset was a portion of the ARDEX project investigating how general water quality, DOM, and nutrients changed across the freshwater-saltwater transition zone. We demonstrated that DOM character, nutrients, and general water quality changed considerably across the transition zone with implications for marine ecosystem health. Water sampling occurred during the 2004 summer from a coast guard vessel travelling north from Inuvik to the Beaufort Sea. This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, with support from the Canada Research Chair Program, Polar Continental Shelf Project, and the Northern Scientific Training Program. We appreciate technical and logistical support from the Inuvik Research Center/Aurora Research Institute, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, and Water Survey of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDataStreamFrench-language works237,207