MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115710809 · doi:10.2196/78484

Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest Based on Time-Series Vital Signs Using Deep Learning: Retrospective Study

2025· article· en· W7115710809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVital signsRetrospective cohort studySigns and symptomsGeneralizationSensitivity (control systems)Health care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA), characterized by an extremely high mortality rate, remains one of the most pressing global public health challenges. It not only causes a substantial strain on health care systems but also severely impacts individual health outcomes. Clinical evidence demonstrates that early identification of CA significantly reduced the mortality rate. However, the developed CA prediction models exhibit limitations such as low sensitivity and high false alarm rates. Moreover, issues with model generalization remain insufficiently addressed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a real-time prediction method based on clinical vital signs, using patient vital sign data from the past 2 hours to predict whether CA would occur within the next 1 hour at 5-minute intervals, thereby enabling timely and accurate prediction of CA events. Additionally, the eICU-CRD dataset was used for external validation to assess the model's generalization capability. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed 4063 patients from the MIMIC-III waveform database, extracting 6 features to develop a deep learning-based CA prediction model named TrGRU. To further enhance performance, statistical features based on a sliding window were also constructed. The TrGRU model was developed using a combination of transformer and gated recurrent unit architectures. The primary evaluation metrics for the model included accuracy, sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), with generalization capability validated using the eICU-CRD dataset. RESULTS: The proposed model yielded an accuracy of 0.904, sensitivity of 0.859, AUROC of 0.957, and AUPRC of 0.949. The results showed that the predictive performance of TrGRU was superior to that of the models reported in previous studies. External validation using the eICU-CRD achieved a sensitivity of 0.813, an AUROC of 0.920, and an AUPRC of 0.848, indicating excellent generalization capability. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model demonstrates high sensitivity and a low false-alarm rate, enabling clinical health care providers to predict CA events in a more timely and accurate manner. The adopted meta-learning approach effectively enhances the model's generalization capability, showcasing its promising clinical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207