Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest Based on Time-Series Vital Signs Using Deep Learning: Retrospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA), characterized by an extremely high mortality rate, remains one of the most pressing global public health challenges. It not only causes a substantial strain on health care systems but also severely impacts individual health outcomes. Clinical evidence demonstrates that early identification of CA significantly reduced the mortality rate. However, the developed CA prediction models exhibit limitations such as low sensitivity and high false alarm rates. Moreover, issues with model generalization remain insufficiently addressed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a real-time prediction method based on clinical vital signs, using patient vital sign data from the past 2 hours to predict whether CA would occur within the next 1 hour at 5-minute intervals, thereby enabling timely and accurate prediction of CA events. Additionally, the eICU-CRD dataset was used for external validation to assess the model's generalization capability. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed 4063 patients from the MIMIC-III waveform database, extracting 6 features to develop a deep learning-based CA prediction model named TrGRU. To further enhance performance, statistical features based on a sliding window were also constructed. The TrGRU model was developed using a combination of transformer and gated recurrent unit architectures. The primary evaluation metrics for the model included accuracy, sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), with generalization capability validated using the eICU-CRD dataset. RESULTS: The proposed model yielded an accuracy of 0.904, sensitivity of 0.859, AUROC of 0.957, and AUPRC of 0.949. The results showed that the predictive performance of TrGRU was superior to that of the models reported in previous studies. External validation using the eICU-CRD achieved a sensitivity of 0.813, an AUROC of 0.920, and an AUPRC of 0.848, indicating excellent generalization capability. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model demonstrates high sensitivity and a low false-alarm rate, enabling clinical health care providers to predict CA events in a more timely and accurate manner. The adopted meta-learning approach effectively enhances the model's generalization capability, showcasing its promising clinical application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".