MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115717852 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2025.3645681

A Novel Unsupervised Change Detection Network Based on Legendre Multiwavelet Theory and Depthwise Convolution With Channel Gating

2025· article· W7115717852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChongqing University of Technology
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Convolution (computer science)Change detectionSynthetic aperture radarDiscriminative modelCluster analysisFeature extractionChannel (broadcasting)Feature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) image change detection is a fundamental task in remote sensing image analysis. However, the poor discriminability of image change features and the low detectability in complex change regions, such as farmland, and riverbanks, are challenging for unsupervised learning methods. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel unsupervised learning network architecture based on Legendre Multi-wavelet theory and Depthwise Convolution with Channel Gating (LWDCG). In LWDCG, we first design an Legendre Wavelet Channel Attention module leveraging LW transform to decompose SAR image into multi-wavelet multi-scale representations and combining with a channel attention mechanism to enhance discriminative feature learning. Then, we employ a hierarchical strategy integrating with Possibilistic C-Means clustering to enhance clustering performance. Furthermore, we introduce a DCG module integrating depthwise separable convolution with a gating mechanism. This design enables both efficient feature extraction and dynamic filtering of change-sensitive features, significantly improving detection performance in complex regions. Finally, Extensive experiments on three public SAR datasets (Sulzberger, Ottawa, and Yellow River) demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving percentage of correct classification (PCC) of 98.88%, 98.46%, and 95.73%, respectively. The results validate the rationality and superiority of the proposed network architecture in SAR change detection tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207