Implikasi Konstitusional dan Sistemik: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Pilkada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 menetapkan bahwa pemilu nasional (pilpres, DPR, dan DPD) dan pemilu lokal (pilkada dan DPRD) tidak lagi dilaksanakan secara serentak, melainkan dipisah dengan jeda 2–2,5 tahun. Putusan ini dianggap sebagai koreksi terhadap beban sistemik pemilu serentak yang diterapkan pada 2019, namun juga menimbulkan perdebatan mengenai wewenang MK dan potensi pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan lima tahunan dalam UUD 1945. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk mengkaji implikasi konstitusional, posisi hukum MK sebagai Negative Legislator, serta tantangan implementasi dalam kerangka hukum positif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa putusan ini memerlukan revisi undang-undang secara komprehensif agar tidak terjadi kekosongan hukum atau krisis legitimasi demokrasi. Selain itu, peran lembaga legislatif dan penyelenggara pemilu menjadi krusial dalam menjembatani ketentuan konstitusi dengan kebutuhan sistem kepemiluan yang lebih efektif dan efisien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".