MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115775213 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2025.3645566

First Multiclass Arctic Sea Ice Classification Results From FY-3E Data

2025· article· W7115775213 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsSea icePrincipal component analysisArcticSea ice concentrationSnowCohen's kappaArctic ice packContextual image classificationPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study performs the first multiclass sea ice classification using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) reflectometry (GNSS-R) data from the Fengyun-3E (FY-3E) satellite. A principal component analysis (PCA) based denoising scheme for GNSS-R delay Doppler maps (DDMs) is proposed. The newly proposed processing methods are applied to FY-3E satellite tracks to retain the most significant features of the data. After removing noise from the DDMs using PCA, DDM classification features are calculated using methods established in the literature. An extremely randomized trees (ET) machine learning (ML) classifier was used to classify the sea ice using the denoised classification observables. The classification results are validated using labels derived from National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) sea ice concentration data. The output classification accuracy was 87.14% with a 0.7834 Kappa coefficient. Per class F1 scores were 89.72%, 85.53%, and 81.34% for first-year ice (FYI), multi-year ice (MYI), and thin ice (TI), respectively. The proposed method produced improvements across all performance metrics compared to classification without PCA based observables and denoising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207