MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115807334

INFLUENCE OF SPRUCE BUDWORM DEFOLIATION ON STREAM MICROBIOMES

2023· dissertation· en· W7115807334 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des Forêts, de la Faune et des ParcsNatural Resources CanadaJarislowsky FoundationMcMaster University
KeywordsSpruce budwormPlant litterBiomass (ecology)Microbial population biologyEcosystemLitterSTREAMSWater qualityDissolved organic carbon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insect pests are the most widespread disturbance in Canadian forests, but resulting impacts of forest defoliation on stream ecosystem functions are poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of a spruce budworm outbreak on water quality and the structure and function of microbial communities in streams of 12 catchments across a gradient of cumulative defoliation severity in the Gaspésie Peninsula, Québec, Canada. Bi-weekly stream habitat sampling was conducted spring to fall 2019-2021, with stream flow rates measured and water samples collected and analyzed for water chemistry parameters, nutrients, and dissolved organic matter (DOM) structure and quality. Algal communities were assessed at the same time by measuring in-situ biomass. Bacteria and fungi communities on leaf packs were assessed by incubating six leaf packs for five weeks (mid-August- late September) in one stream reach per watershed. Microbial community composition of leaf packs was determined using metabarcoding of 16S and ITS rRNA genes, and functions were examined using extracellular enzyme assays, leaf litter decomposition rates, and taxonomic functional assignments. This study determined that cumulative defoliation increased stream temperatures, flow rates, and SUVA (DOM aromaticity), but not nutrients. It increased algal biomass and altered microbial community composition, with a stronger influence on bacteria than fungi. The observed increases in SUVA and algal biomass corresponded with changes to bacteria carbon cycling functions, which indicated that microbes were preferentially selecting carbohydrates produced by algae rather than the aromatic compounds from increased terrestrial inputs. There were no changes to other bacteria or fungi functions and no changes to taxonomic or functional diversity. Overall, results indicate that forest pest outbreaks alter carbon inputs to streams and the structure and function of stream microbial communities associated with carbon cycling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology→French-language works237,207→