MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115808160

The White Bronze Monument Phenomenon: The Study of Agency and Fashion Through a 19th Century Mortuary Trend

2025· dissertation· en· W7115808160 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Agency (philosophy)EliteBronzeBronze AgeStyle (visual arts)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores individual agency within a fashion trend through a case study of Victorian zinc grave monuments produced by the St. Thomas White Bronze Company of St. Thomas, Ontario between 1883 and 1900. A total of 222 monuments from the core area around St. Thomas, other regions of Ontario and the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba and British Columbia were analysed in relation to the identities of the individuals who were commemorated by and who selected the monuments. Three main patterns emerged: 1) although cast in the same factory and from the same material, monument styles and forms varied regionally, 2) the social characteristics of consumers varied by region, demonstrating that they were not embraced by a uniform demographic group, and 3) their distribution shows they did not radiate outward uniformly from their point of origin, but instead occur within distinct pockets of adoption. Findings show that consumers, not just producers or sales agents, played a central role in the dissemination of White Bronze monuments. In the locus, near St. Thomas, White Bronze monuments signaled elite status and were consumed by the social elite, as well as individuals seeking alignment with the elite. Elsewhere, in contrast, they served as an inexpensive yet novel alternative to conventional monument materials, often used in idiosyncratic ways by individuals with more limited means. Historically overlooked groups, including lower-income families, women and parents of young children, adopted the type to fit their own commemorative needs, typically selecting smaller, less ostentatious examples. Knowledge of the type also varied from advertising and extensive media coverage in the locus to variable modes of dissemination in other areas. Frequently, they were introduced to new communities through consumer migration, by individuals who carried knowledge from previous locales and commissioned White Bronze memorials in their new settings. Overall, this thesis demonstrates that fashion trends are not passively received but are actively negotiated through the interplay of personal choice, social positioning and cultural context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207