A CAMERA-LIDAR FUSION FRAMEWORK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent Transportation Systems are advanced technologies used to reduce traffic and increase road safety for vulnerable road users. Real-time traffic monitoring is an important technology for collecting and reporting the information required to achieve these goals through the detection and tracking of road users inside an intersection. To be effective, these systems must be robust to all environmental conditions. This thesis explores the fusion of camera and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors to create an accurate and real-time traffic monitoring system. Sensor fusion leverages complimentary characteristics of the sensors to increase system performance in low- light and inclement weather conditions. To achieve this, three primary components are developed: a 3D LiDAR detection pipeline, a camera detection pipeline, and a decision-level sensor fusion module. The proposed pipeline is lightweight, running at 46 Hz on modest computer hardware, and accurate, scoring 3% higher than the camera-only pipeline based on the Higher Order Tracking Accuracy metric. The camera-LiDAR fusion system is built on the ROS 2 framework, which provides a well-defined and modular interface for developing and evaluated new detection and tracking algorithms. Overall, the fusion of camera and LiDAR sensors will enable future traffic monitoring systems to provide cities with real-time information critical for increasing safety and convenience for all road-users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".