A Phenomenological Study of Henri Nouwen’s Life and Writings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upon returning from serving overseas amongst the urban poor in Papua New Guinea, I questioned the paucity of Canadian Reformed churches (the federation of churches that retains my credentials) in the inner cities of urban Canada, as well as the apparent mobility drift of churches from urban centres to more rural or suburban locales. These questions came to the fore when I commenced a church plant with sixty starting members (many middle-class) in a lower socioeconomic community in east Hamilton (McQuesten). The socioeconomic disparity between those who chose to be part of the church plant and the majority of people in McQuesten demanded some intentional reflection, which planted the seeds for this phenomenological research project. Desiring to approach these questions phenomenologically, I was drawn to the work of the Catholic thinker Henri Nouwen. Although Nouwen was not an evangelical church planter, he was a prolific writer who shared his existential journey from a distinguished position at Harvard University to L’Arche Daybreak, a care home for people with disabilities in Toronto. Was Nouwen’s experience and vision of downward mobility generative for those engaged in church planting in lower socio-economic neighbourhoods in urban Canada? To address this question, I studied four themes rooted in Nouwen’s corpus: home, time, wealth, and power. This investigation took place through extant literature and twenty interviews with missional leaders serving in predominantly lower socio-economic urban centres across Canada. Although I was able to answer the research question in the affirmative, Nouwen’s works are critically analyzed and the themes are actively engaged through the interviews, providing readers with the ability to examine their own journeys into greater intimacy with Christ and greater compassion for the marginalized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.038 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".