Impacts and Tradeoffs of Mining in Igluligaarjuk, Nunavut
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: In the community of Igluligaarjuk (located in Nunavut, Canada), increased shipping is a major concern due to its impacts on marine mammals and the environment. This community is particularly affected because of its location relative to the mine’s shipping route. Mining has also been found to have implications for Inuit livelihoods, cultural practices, and health in other Nunavut communities. Thus, this study seeks to explore how nearby mining has impacted the health and well-being of Inuit in Igluligaarjuk. Methods: This study took place in Igluligaarjuk from January 18th to 31st, 2023. Using a community-based participatory research approach, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine Inuit women aged 35-85 years old. Participants were recruited through selective and snowball sampling and were included if they were an Inuit woman at least 29 years old who was currently living in the community. Results: Several participants supported the mine as a source of employment and income. However, many were also concerned about the impacts of the mine on the environment and the implications it has for acquiring country food and animal skins. Participants were frustrated with low local employment rates and the treatment of Inuit applying for and working at the mine. The work rotation was also determined to be a significant stressor for familial caretakers and inter-family relationships. These results inform a framework that demonstrates how mining enables and disrupts Inuit from connecting with their cultural identity, thus affecting their health and well-being. Conclusion: Participants remain supportive of mining in the region, but continued support is contingent upon negative conditions being ameliorated and greater benefits being actualized in Igluligaarjuk. The mine should look to improve communication, increase local employment, and invest in tangible supports for the community. A greater community presence may strengthen relationships with the mine and improve community receptiveness moving forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".