MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115813979

TRANSIENTS IN A SMALL LEAD COOLED REACTOR

2023· dissertation· en· W7115813979 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity Network of Excellence in Nuclear EngineeringMcMaster University
KeywordsCoolantFlow (mathematics)Modular designLead (geology)Heat transferSensitivity (control systems)Mass flowComputational fluid dynamicsNatural circulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the recent years there has been growing interest in small modular reactors (SMRs). Before this type of reactors are deployed it is necessary to assess their safety with the newest available tools. This thesis focuses on one SMR, the SEALER reactor, which is a 3 to 10 MWe lead cooled reactor intended for remote communities or mines. The designer of the SEALER reactor has previously identified a possible issue during a loss of flow transient. At the beginning of the transient, the mass flow at the pumps undergoes a fluctuation that could lead to reverse flow if amplified. The first part of the thesis was to perform an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis using an existing lumped-parameter model. Two types of transients were studied: unprotected loss of flow and unprotected overpower. Results show that, for both transients, temperatures remain well below safety limits for the entire parameters space. However, it is also found that reverse flow at the pumps is possible by changing some parameters in a realistic way. It was therefore decided to develop a more realistic model to study the same transients, which constitutes the second and main part of the thesis. The new model uses CFD for simulating the flow of coolant in the entire primary circuit. The complex components (fuel channels, pumps and steam generators) are replaced with a simple geometry and appropriate heat and momentum sources/sinks. The CFD simulation is coupled with a custom-made code for solving heat transfer in the fuel pins and to point kinetics for neutronics. To demonstrate the viability of the model, a validation exercise was performed to ensure that the CFD part is able to reproduce experimental data with important features, like temperature stratification and a jet into a plenum. Results from the new model confirm the mass flow fluctuation if a small pump flywheel is used. For a flywheel of reasonable size, transients are slow without any mass flow fluctuation, and temperature variations are small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207