MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115817684

Experiences of Canadian Women using Cannabis for Fibromyalgia Symptom Management: A Qualitative Description Study

2025· dissertation· en· W7115817684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabisThematic analysisFibromyalgiaQuality of life (healthcare)Qualitative researchLegalizationHealth care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex chronic pain disorder affecting approximately 3% of Canadians, predominantly women over the age of 40. Characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, cognitive impairments, and delayed diagnosis, FM often results in significant personal and healthcare challenges. Traditional pharmacological treatments are frequently ineffective, leading individuals to explore alternative therapies such as cannabis. Despite increasing legalization and accessibility in Canada, limited research has explored how women with FM use cannabis to manage their symptoms. To address this gap, a qualitative descriptive design was employed to capture the lived experiences of fifteen women with FM who currently or previously have used cannabis therapeutically. Participants were recruited from six Canadian provinces. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually via Zoom and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four key themes emerged: (1) Cannabis as a Core Component of Fibromyalgia Management – participants described cannabis as transformative, helping with pain, sleep, and quality of life; (2) Barriers and Challenges to Cannabis Use – participants experienced stigma, lack of medical guidance, high costs, and difficulties determining dosage; (3) Cannabis Use in Daily Life – participants emphasized intentional, self-monitored use to balance symptom management with daily responsibilities; and (4) Advice for Healthcare Professionals – participants advocated for nonjudgmental, patient-centered care that legitimizes cannabis as a viable treatment option. This study highlights the perceived value of cannabis in FM management and the persistent barriers faced by women using it for therapeutic purposes. Findings underscore the need for improved education among healthcare providers, increased affordability and accessibility of medical cannabis, and the promotion of collaborative, stigma-free care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0240.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207