PREGNANT TEENS ACCESSING MENTAL HEALTH CARE IN NUNAVUT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Not only does research convey that young mothers face multidimensional issues, but many scholars and the World Health Organization describe teenage pregnancy as a risk for both the mother and the child (WHO, 2016). Understandings of teenage pregnancy are nuanced, and different thoughts exist on both the negative and positive psychological and social outcomes for both the mother and the baby of teenage pregnancy within Canada. Pregnant Teenagers in Nunavut specifically face unique challenges that are different from the majority of Canada, such as the long-term effects of colonialism and colonial legacy systems, geographical isolation, extreme climates, and lack of accessibility to health care centres. Research has explored the mental health challenges faced by this population, but there remains a gap in understanding the factors that influence pregnant teenagers' access to mental health care services. This systematic review aims to answer the question: What factors serve as barriers or enablers for pregnant teenagers seeking mental health care in Nunavut? It is important to do research with and for Inuit pregnant teenagers in Nunavut that recognizes how the long-term consequences of colonialism and intergenerational trauma is critical to addressing the mental health needs and experiences of this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".