The bedrock of organization transformation: Examining the relationship between leadership, culture and communication in successful change management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need for strategic change management that engages stakeholders is ever present as organizations frequently realign priorities to match the current zeitgeist. This research paper examined how and to what extent an effective communication function determines change management success through the lens of organizational culture, communication barriers, and leadership support. Research considered internal communication best practices for engagement, relationship management, and the role of leadership alongside change management frameworks. Thirty-four participants completed an online survey from February 10 to May 4, 2023. Additionally, 10 interviews were conducted with participants who identified as mid or senior level communicators/public relations professionals with Canadian experience planning or implementing organizational change management initiatives within the past five years. Findings demonstrate a relationship between leadership support, organizational culture, and symmetrical communication that determines change management success. The value of communication is further emphasized by the study’s results as a key element that supports change management planning, implementation, and postmortem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it