Les stratégies mises en oeuvre par les femmes monoparentales d'origines diverses pour concilier leur sphère personnelle et professionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Le Québec dénombre de plus en plus de familles monoparentales avec enfants. Touchant les familles de tous horizons, sa population immigrante n'y déroge pas. Ce statut social entraine une charge de travail quotidienne importante pour les femmes qui vivent cette situation. Aussi, cette recherche a pour objectif de comprendre les stratégies mises en œuvre par les femmes monoparentales d'origines diverses dans le but de concilier leurs sphères personnelle et professionnelle. Différentes questions se posent : quelles sont les difficultés vécues par les femmes monoparentales d'origine différente ? En fonction de certaines différences culturelles, la CEF/VP est-elle plus complexe à gérer ? Dans le but d'atteindre ces objectifs de recherche, une approche qualitative a été privilégiée basée sur les données de l'arène médiatique portant sur les témoignages des mères monoparentales d'origines diverses. Pour répondre à notre objectif, l'approche qualitative a été privilégiée à travers une revue médiatique. Les résultats montrent que les mères monoparentales d'origines diverses rencontrent de nombreux obstacles pour concilier emploi, famille et vie personnelle, tels que le manque de services de garde, la rigidité des horaires, l'isolement social et la discrimination. Malgré ces défis, elles déploient des stratégies d'adaptation variées comme le recours aux réseaux communautaires, l'entraide entre mères, l'entrepreneuriat et la valorisation de leurs repères culturels. Ces actions reflètent leur détermination à améliorer leurs conditions de vie et celles de leurs enfants. Par ailleurs, ce mémoire contribue à combler un manque de recherches réunissant les réalités des femmes québécoises et immigrées, tout en soulignant l'importance d'un meilleur soutien social, communautaire et organisationnel. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : conciliation emploi-famille, monoparentalité, immigration, stratégies d'adaptation. »-- « Quebec is home to a growing number of single-parent families with children. This affects families from all backgrounds and the immigrant population is no exception. For women in this situation, this social status brings forth a significant daily workload. This research aims to understand the strategies used by single mothers from diverse back grounds to balance their personal and professional lives. What are the difficulties faced by single mothers from different backgrounds? Are WFB/PL more complex to manage because of certain cultural differences? In order to achieve these research objectives, a qualitative approach was adopted based on data from the media arena focusing on the testimonies of single mothers from diverse origins. To address our objective, the qualitative approach was chosen based on a media review. The results show that single mothers from different backgrounds face numerous challenges in balancing work, family, and personal life, such as lack of childcare facilities, rigid work schedules, social isolation, and discrimination. Despite these challenges, they adopt various coping strategies such as using community networks, mutual support among mothers, entrepreneurship, and promoting their cultural references. These actions reflect their determination to improve their living conditions and those of their children. Moreover, this thesis helps to fill a gap in research by bringing together the experiences of both Quebec-born and immigrant women, while highlighting the importance of better social, community, and organizational support. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : work-life balance, single parenthood, immigration, coping strategies. »--
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".