MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115885036 · doi:10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100248

Evaluating the effect of point-sampling on univariate point and interval forecasting of cerebral physiologic signals using ARIMA modeling in acute traumatic neural injury

2025· article· en· W7115885036 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroscience Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of ManitobaCanada Foundation for InnovationHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageTraumatic brain injuryCerebral perfusion pressureCerebral autoregulationUnivariateTemporal resolutionAutoregressive modelInterval (graph theory)Time point

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution physiological signals, such as intracranial pressure (ICP) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ), are critical for managing traumatic brain injury (TBI) by enabling continuous monitoring of cerebral autoregulation and vascular reactivity. These signals provide essential insights into brain perfusion dynamics, supporting timely clinical interventions. However, the high temporal resolution of these data introduces challenges in real-time use, integration into predictive models, and computational efficiency. Consequently, resolution reduction techniques are essential for simplifying the data while retaining critical features necessary for accurate prediction and modeling. Using the Multi-omic Analytics and Integrative Neuroinformatics in the HUman Brain (MAIN-HUB) Lab database, high-frequency cerebral physiologic dataset, we aimed to evaluate the effects of point-sampling resolution reduction on point and interval predictions using the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model for both raw signals and derived indices. Temporal resolution was reduced by selecting the first value within non-overlapping intervals, ranging from 1-min (min) to 12-h windows. A total of 125 patient data was analyzed across various temporal resolutions. The results indicated that ARIMA models performed well at higher resolutions (e.g., 1-min), capturing short-term physiological dynamics with lower errors. However, as resolution decreased, errors and variability increased, particularly for signals like mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which exhibit rapid or complex physiological changes. The findings underscore the need to carefully balance temporal resolution, model performance, and computational efficiency, especially when dealing with high-frequency physiological data in clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroscience Informatics→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→