MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115888764 · doi:10.3390/mining5040086

Atterberg Limits and Strength Relationships of Oil Sands Tailings

2025· article· en· W7115888764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMining · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada's Oil Sands Innovation Alliance
KeywordsAtterberg limitsTailingsOil sandsLand reclamationTailings dam

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reclamation of tailings facilities at oil sands mines in northern Alberta presents a significant challenge for industry, regulators, and researchers. Atterberg limits are an established method for quantifying clay behaviour in geotechnical engineering, which has been adopted for oil sands tailings due to their high clay mineral content. Correlations between remoulded undrained shear strength and liquidity index, originally developed for natural clays, have also been applied to oil sands tailings. This paper proposes a new material-specific correlation between remoulded undrained shear strength and liquidity index based on laboratory testing of oil sands tailings. Additionally, the results of Atterberg limits tests on oil sands tailings suggests that the inherent variability of the test itself has a greater effect on the measured value than the preparation method and test procedure. The results of this study support the idea that index properties such as Atterberg limits can provide a cost-effective method for field monitoring and early-stage reclamation design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it