MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115920268 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17965944

List of requirements and Information Delivery Specification (IDS) for Building Performance Simulation (BPS)

2015· dataset· en· W7115920268 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersEnergimyndighetenÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
KeywordsUploadListing (finance)Column (typography)Requirements analysisWork (physics)Simulation modelingInformation system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The uploaded files include: A spreadsheet listing the requirements for Building Performance Simulation (BPS); An Information Delivery Specification (IDS) developed based on this list of requirements. Both documents were created as part of the "IDS group" effort within the IEA EBC Annex 91 initiative, which focuses on "openBIM for Energy Efficient Buildings". The objective is to define a comprehensive list of requirements that IFC models must meet to be utilised for Building Performance Simulation (BPS) purposes, as outlined by the authors. Each requirement is categorised within the BPS spectrum, as indicated in the "Category" column of the spreadsheet. The spreadsheet is organised as described in the "Description" sheet. To export the IDS, the IDS4ALL tool was used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1950.177

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)French-language works237,207