Strategies of Emancipation in Contemporary Polish Literature: AffectiveAutofiction in Women’s Writing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns3:p>The objective of this article is to provide an analysis of literature written by women in Poland duringthe fi rst quarter of the twenty-fi rst century. The author’s aim was to explore few selected literarytheories that most accurately refl ect on women’s history of literature. The discussion combinethe concepts of feminist new materialism, the affective turn, and theories of nomadic subjectivity.Author examines the interrelations of those theories as well as their impact on the interpretationof Polish contemporary prose. This overview is further complemented by refl ections on women’sautobiographical writing and controversial term „women’s literature”. The author identifi es worksin which all identifi ed tendencies are evident, especially in their themes, narrative strategies andmetaphorical frameworks. The books are results of the long-standing social and literary practicesof several generations of women writers and scholars and are used as tools for the broader feministdiscourse.</ns3:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it