MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115940326 · doi:10.28984/cnpj.v5i2.489

Case Study: Counselling Older Women on Contraception Options

2025· article· W7115940326 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Nurse Practitioner Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralFertilityFamily planningPopulationDeveloped countrySexually active

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 37-year-old female presents to her nurse practitioner requesting a referral to gynecology for sterilization. She is divorced from the father of her two children and newly dating seeking contraception. Although a natural decline in fertility begins at age 35, effective contraception is required until natural sterility is confirmed by menopause. Therefore, nurse practitioners are in a unique position to counsel older women on contraceptive options while considering safety, efficacy and patient preference. This case highlights the importance of contraception in older women and methods for consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Nurse Practitioner JournalSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207