MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115979900

Genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein using single step and multi-trait prediction models

2025· article· en· W7115979900 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgricultural Research ServiceOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationScotland’s Rural CollegeGenome AlbertaBundesamt für LandwirtschaftAgriculture VictoriaDirection Générale Opérationnelle Agriculture, Ressources Naturelles et Environnement du Service Public de WallonieIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchU.S. Department of AgricultureUniversity of ConnecticutGardiner FoundationZoetisGenome British ColumbiaService Public de WallonieFrieslandCampinaGenome CanadaGouvernement WallonOntario GenomicsChina Agricultural UniversityLa Trobe UniversityOak Ridge Associated UniversitiesEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of EnergyWageningen University and ResearchAarhus UniversitetInstituto Colombiano de Bienestar FamiliarInnovationsfonden
KeywordsBest linear unbiased predictionMilkingUnivariateMethane emissionsGreenhouse gasPredictive modellingDairy cattleMethaneRestricted maximum likelihoodVariance components
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions and pose a significant challenge to the sustainability of livestock production. To mitigate these emissions, breeding strategies have been mentioned as a promising tool, but prediction accuracies of methane emission traits are still limited by the size of datasets with records. Hence, using methane concentrations (MeC) in Danish Holstein cows as target trait, this study evaluated the predictive performance of pedigree-based BLUP (pBLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in univariate and multi-trait models, the latter including milk production traits. Previously, both ssGBLUP as well as multi-trait models have been shown to enhance prediction accuracies. The dataset included 1,744 primiparous (PP) and 2,989 multiparous (MP) cows from 15 Danish dairy farms, with over 600,000 daily records of MeC, fat yield (FY), and energy-corrected milk yield (ECM). Methane concentrations were measured using sniffers, and milk production data was acquired from milking robots and national milk recording data. At first, a pedigree-based variance component estimation revealed heritabilities between 0.17 (SE=0.03) for MeC in PP and MP cows to 0.38 (SE=0.06) for ECM in PP cows. Similarly, repeatabilities ranged from 0.32 (MeC, SE=0.01) to 0.81 (ECM, SE=0.01). Genetic correlations between MeC and production traits were positive but unfavorable, i.e., in a range from 0.15 (SE=0.13) between MeC and ECM in PP cows to 0.41 (SE=0.09) between MeC and ECM in MP cows, indicating a genetic antagonism between reducing emissions and maintaining milk yield. Prediction accuracies were generally higher for ssGBLUP compared to pBLUP models (up to 61.90% increase), and for MP cows compared to PP cows. Multi-trait models outperformed univariate models, particularly when phenotypic data for FY and ECM were available in both the reference and validation populations. The highest accuracy for MeC prediction in PP cows was 0.38 (ssGBLUP), while MP cows reached up to 0.51, both for the multi-trait model including both, ECM and FY. While incorporating FY and ECM improved MeC prediction, the unfavorable genetic correlations highlight the risk of compromising milk production when selecting for reduced emissions. Therefore, future breeding strategies should aim to expand methane phenotyping, develop methane traits independent of milk production, and implement multi-trait selection indices that balance environmental and economic goals. This study demonstrates the potential of multi-trait genomic prediction to enhance the genetic evaluation of methane emissions and supports its integration into sustainable dairy cattle breeding programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→