Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital Twin (DT) technology is revolutionizing industries by creating virtual replicas of physical systems, enabling real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and performance optimization. At the heart of DT lies a combination of advanced technologies that work together to ensure its effectiveness. This paper explores the core components of DT, including the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Big Data Analytics, Cloud and Edge Computing, and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). IoT plays a crucial role by collecting real-time data from sensors and connected devices, forming the foundation for DT applications. AI and ML then process this data, allowing systems to make intelligent decisions, detect faults, and improve efficiency. Big Data Analytics further enhances DT capabilities by handling vast amounts of structured and unstructured information, extracting meaningful insights for better decision-making. Cloud and Edge Computing support DT operations by providing scalable storage and processing power, ensuring both accessibility and real-time responsiveness. Meanwhile, CPS bridges the gap between the physical and digital worlds, enabling seamless communication between them. Beyond these core technologies, DT relies on advanced modeling techniques, including physics-based simulations and data-driven models, to create accurate digital replicas. Standardized communication protocols and interoperability frameworks are also critical in ensuring seamless integration across different systems. At the same time, cybersecurity measures and data privacy strategies are essential for protecting DT applications from potential threats. The use of DT is expanding across industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, smart cities, and energy, showcasing its potential to drive digital transformation. However, challenges remain, including high implementation costs, computational complexity, and integration difficulties. Overcoming these obstacles requires ongoing technological advancements and collaboration between researchers, industry professionals, and policymakers to establish standardized frameworks and ensure scalability. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the key technologies that power DT, examining their roles, interactions, and future directions to enhance adoption and effectiveness across various sectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".