MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116048175 · doi:10.82417/38qh-a992

Enhanced Hill-type model for muscle contraction simulation

2025· other· en· W7116048175 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContraction (grammar)Muscle contractionConcentricKinematicsMuscle fibreMuscle architectureSciatic nerveIsometric exerciseStretch reflex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of muscle activation on injury mitigation during high impact accidents is still debated. To accurately describe the behavior of muscle contraction during high-dynamic impacts, classic Hill models are no longer adequate. Recent studies emphasized the need to decouple the muscle fiber contractile unit’s dynamics from the tendon’s elastic behavior to prevent numerical instabilities during high-frequency oscillations. Consequently, an Enhanced Hill Type Model (EHTM) was developed, comprising two distinct contraction units to better model stress absorption by the tendons and a built-in neural controller that triggers muscle contraction based on muscle spindle reflex and monosynaptic stretch reflex. This study aims to translate the open-source LSDYNA® code of the EHTM to OpenRadioss® and validate its behavior at the muscle fiber level. The validation dataset of the EHTM model was derived from an experiment on a piglet calf. The tibia was fixed, and the sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated to induce concentric muscle contraction, lifting masses of 100, 400, 800 and 1800g. An encoder recorded the axial velocity of the mass during contraction. In the simulation, the EHTM property were assigned to a spring element in HyperMesh®, embedded at one end and subjected to the same successive experimental loads. The axial velocity of the loading node was then recorded. The model showed good agreement with experimental kinematic data. Despite a pronounced attenuation of the second experimental contraction peak for 400g and 800g masses, the ETHM’s spring property accurately modeled the kinematic contraction of the piglet calf for the first loading masses (100, 400 and 800g). However, over 800g, the model failed to sufficiently damp the contraction speed. To address the discrepancies, a desirability study should be carried out on the damping parameters. The next step of this study will focus on implementing this property in a set of neck muscles to characterize the impact of muscle activation on the risk of spinal cord injury

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207