MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116056139 · doi:10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100419

Considering tree species of the future: Tree species in Mexico predicted to have suitable current climate in the United States and Canada

2025· article· en· W7116056139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Ecosystems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research StationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsClimate changeLatitudeGlobal warmingVegetation (pathology)Current (fluid)Climate modelSpecies distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suitable climate for tree species currently located in Mexico may shift to the United States and Canada under future warming, resulting in the potential for tree species shifts, with new species gained in the USA and Canada and species losses in Mexico. To isolate dynamics, I modeled distributions of 184 commonly recorded wide-ranging or transboundary tree species of North America, including presence in Mexico, and 258 tree species primarily abundant in Mexico, including 51 endemic species, under current climate and predicted to three future climates (projected warming of 4.3 to 8.8 °C during 2071–2100 in North America). Secondarily, I identified patterns between species distributions and outcomes. Model accuracies were 0.98 for withheld samples, with coldest temperature as the most important variable. Species with distributions that were larger in area and lower in elevation (likely related to the modeling algorithm being able to locate more analogous climates) and higher in latitude (due to greater area in the northern North American continent) were more probable to expand distributions under warming temperatures. Predicted losses in suitable future climate conditions occurred for 36 of 184 wide-ranging species and 103 of 258 Mexican species. For wide-ranging species, losses occurred in Mexico and extended along the USA Gulf Coast, with gains in the western USA and Canada. For Mexican species, losses occurred south of Mexico, with gains in northern Mexico, the southeastern USA, and along the Pacific Coast from the USA to Canada. In Mexico, tree species overall continued to have suitable future climate conditions. In the USA, 38 of 184 wide-ranging species and 246 of 258 Mexican species may be gained in the future, and generally, predictions were for suitable climate conditions both now and in the future. In Canada, suitable future climate conditions for 35 of 184 wide-ranging species were predicted, of which 10 species were predicted to have suitable current climate conditions, and suitable future climate conditions for 80 of 258 Mexican species were predicted, of which 21 species were predicted to have suitable current climate conditions. Many tree species present in Mexico were predicted to already have a suitable current climate in the USA and Canada, which suggests a lag in ecosystem transition that may be addressed by current management to support biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it