Performance Analysis of Underwater Hybrid Prime Code and Manchester Encoding FSO-CDMA System Based on Multiple-Access Interference Cancellation Receiver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an underwater free-space optical code division multiple-access (FSO-CDMA) communication system that integrates differential pulse position modulation (DPPM) with a developed hybrid prime code (HPC) and Manchester encoding, alongside a multiple-access interference cancellation (MAIC) receiver. The system is designed to address the challenges posed by underwater turbulence, absorption, and scattering. A 1-watt laser source operating at a wavelength of 455 nm is utilized to mitigate these effects, thereby reducing link absorption, scattering, and attenuation. The MAIC receiver is employed to minimize noise and interference, significantly enhancing the system’s bit-error rate (BER) performance under turbulent conditions. The paper details the construction and correlation analysis of the HPC, and investigates both instantaneous and average BER performance based on the proposed modulation-coding technique and MAIC receiver. Results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves a 438 m link distance with an 8.33 Gbps data rate and 1.33 Tbps × user network throughput over a 184,900 m2 coverage area, maintaining a BER of 10−9.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".