MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116073128 · doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014

Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment After Total Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Vascular Grafts: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W7116073128 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Vascular Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobialAbdominal surgeryDuration (music)Abdominal aortic aneurysmVascular surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery, associated with high mortality. In addition to surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal postoperative treatment duration. This systematic review evaluates the optimal length of antimicrobial treatment in patients with abdominal VGEI after total graft explantation. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 19, 2024. Eligible studies reported on antimicrobial treatment following total explantation of infected abdominal vascular grafts, including cases with graft-related fistulas. Exclusion criteria comprised studies on partial graft explantation, specific microorganisms causing distinct clinical diseases (Coxiella burnetii, Brucella species), mycobacterial infections, infected native aortoiliac aneurysms, and thoracic and peripheral VGEI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, infection-free survival, infection recurrence, and graft patency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Of 132 screened studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies comprising 776 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported postoperative antimicrobial treatment durations ranged from 2 to 170 weeks (median 13 weeks), with some studies describing lifelong treatment. All-cause mortality varied between 23% and 57%. No association could be found between antimicrobial treatment duration and mortality. DISCUSSION: Limitations include the retrospective design, leading to confounding by indication and information bias. Patient populations were heterogeneous, and follow-up durations were often insufficient for long-term outcome assessment. This review underscores the limited quality of evidence available on this topic and underlines the importance of good quality research. CONCLUSION: The optimal postoperative antimicrobial treatment duration following complete explantation of infected abdominal grafts remains uncertain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it