MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116075484 · doi:10.82417/3npf-d934

A novel CFD-experimental analysis for enhancing air distribution and indoor air quality in existing buildings using high induction diffusers

2025· other· en· W7116075484 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsHVACEnergy recovery ventilationASHRAE 90.1Indoor air qualityVentilation (architecture)Thermal comfortAirflowDiffuser (optics)Efficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between 2000 and 2021, Canada’s energy use rose by 10%, though efficiency gains prevented a 21% increase. Space heating and cooling dominate consumption, making up 63% in homes and 61% in commercial buildings. Ceiling-based ventilation worsens thermal stratification, raising energy use and lowering indoor air quality. This study explores high-induction diffusers for better ventilation without increasing heating and cooling loads. A combined computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and experimental approach was employed to evaluate the ventilation effectiveness of high-induction diffusers in comparison to conventional diffuser designs. The study utilized ASHRAE Standards 62.1 and 129 to quantify ventilation effectiveness (Ez), while evaluating the local mean age of air. Experimental measurements were conducted at the Indoor Environment Research Facility (IERF), assessing air distribution performance under controlled conditions using tracer gas decay methods with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Results indicate that high-induction diffusers significantly improve air mixing, reducing thermal stratification and localized discomfort. Enhanced entrainment leads to a higher Ez value, thereby optimizing airflow distribution and mitigating the necessity for supplementary heating or cooling devices. In retrofitted systems, increased Ez improves IAQ without increasing ventilation rates, whereas in new HVAC designs, it enables reductions in outdoor air requirements, minimizing system oversizing and reducing energy consumption. Findings suggest that integrating high-induction diffusers in ventilation systems can enhance occupant comfort, lower HVAC operational costs, and support energy conservation efforts up to 25%. This study contributes to advancing HVAC design by demonstrating that optimizing air diffusion strategies can achieve both energy efficiency and improved thermal comfort in commercial and residential buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207