MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116077828 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.16.694397

Human bone marrow adipocytes drive prostate cancer bone metastasis progression via lipid-mediated induction of Angiopoietin-like 4

2025· article· W7116077828 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsCrandall University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerBone metastasisBone marrowMetastasisGene silencingANGPTL4MediatorHuman boneStromal cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bone is the main metastatic site in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) and contains bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds), which account for more than 70% of adult bone marrow. However, their role in the progression of PCa metastases remains poorly understood. Herein, we developed a physiologically relevant 3D culture model using primary human BMAds from red hematopoietic rich-areas (rBMAds) and we showed that rBMAds engage in metabolic crosstalk with PCa cells. Specifically, rBMAds release free fatty acids (FFAs) through a non-canonical lipolytic pathway and these FFAs are taken up by PCa cells inducing a transcriptional reprogramming that promotes motility. Among the responsive genes, Angiopoietin like 4 (ANGPTL4) is the most upregulated via a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-dependent mechanism, and its silencing abolishes the rBMAd-driven migratory and invasive phenotype. Clinically, elevated ANGPTL4 expression is associated with poor overall survival specifically in PCa bone metastases, is maintained during metastatic progression, and is indicative of aggressive disease. Together, our findings uncover a novel adipocyte-tumor interaction and identify ANGPTL4 as a key mediator and potential therapeutic target in bone-metastatic PCa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207