MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116086323 · doi:10.82417/318t-r610

Exploring miscible jet dynamics in complex fluids

2025· other· en· W7116086323 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetroleum Technology Alliance CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsJet (fluid)PerforationNozzleRADIUSDimensionless quantityStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesFlow (mathematics)Newtonian fluidRheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the fluid dynamics of a Newtonian jet injected horizontally into a viscoplastic (yield stress) ambient fluid, a process relevant to various industrial applications, including jet cleaning process in oil and gas wells. To replicate industrial scenario, a perforated wall is considered between the nozzle and the tank wall, dividing the flow domain into two zones. We focus on the effects of key parameters, including the perforation diameter and the rheological properties of the ambient fluid, on jet behavior. The jet radius is used as a main metric to quantify mixing, while self-similarity is examined across varying conditions to provide insights into jet dynamics. The results reveal that a reduction in the perforation diameter leads to an increase in jet radius in the first zone, while causing a decrease in the second zone. In addition, the jet maintains its self-similar behavior, regardless of the perforation size. Furthermore, the presence of a viscoplastic fluid contributes to a decrease in the jet radius in both zones and deviate from self-similarity behavior, highlighting the significant impact of yield stress on the jet flow dynamics. These findings provide valuable insights into jet flow and can be leveraged to optimize jet cleaning processes, with the dimensionless results allowing for their extension to a range of relevant applications involving jets and non-Newtonian fluids, including liquid-in-liquid printing, cleaning-in-place systems, and industrial mixing operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207