MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116089061 · doi:10.82417/11tw-p856

Mechanistic understanding of the effects of graphene oxide on the thermal conductivity of polymer fuel cells

2025· other· en· W7116089061 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMembraneGrapheneNafionOxidePolymerElectrolyteThermal conductivityDurability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient thermal management is critical for the performance and durability of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), particularly under dry and high-temperature conditions. This study examines the impact of graphene oxide (GO) incorporation on the thermal conductivity (TC) of Nafion membranes using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. To this end, the TC of 0.8 wt% GO-loaded Nafion membrane was compared with cast Nafion membranes at varying hydration levels. Additionally, the influence of temperature (300 K, 325 K, and 350 K) on TC was evaluated for both cast and GO-loaded membranes. It was found hydration level increment leads to a 14% TC enhancement, which was consistent with the literature results. On the other hand, the addition of GO reduced TC of the dry membrane by 4.7%. For dry membranes, temperature elevation induces slightly negative impacts on TC in both cast and GO-loaded samples. This reduction is primarily attributed to the fragmentation of connected water clusters, which weakens interchain heat transfer pathways. The water clusters’ fragmentation is more pronounced with the presence of GO. Further structural and interaction analysis revealed that the strong interactions of GO with water molecules prevented the formation of connected water clusters. These insights provide valuable guidance for optimizing the TC of PEMFC membranes, emphasizing that optimized GO dispersion, hydration control, and functionalization strategies are essential when incorporating GO-based PEMs to ensure efficient heat dissipation and long-term operational reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207