MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116096571 · doi:10.82417/4sy6-6908

Computational thermodynamics approach to overcoming challenges in high-nitrogen low-manganese stainless steel production

2025· other· en· W7116096571 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersMitacs
KeywordsNozzleCastingChemical thermodynamicsCombustionCurrent (fluid)Electric arc furnaceNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsContinuous casting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The addition of nitrogen (N) to low-manganese (Mn) stainless steel significantly enhances its properties. However, producing high-N steel presents challenges, including N volatilization and casting system clogging. A strong foundation in thermodynamics is critical for understanding the direction and extent of chemical reactions under varying conditions. Building on thermodynamics, reaction kinetics provide insight into deviations from equilibrium. Experimental approaches, whether at the laboratory or pilot scale, are often time-intensive and costly. Computational thermodynamics offers an efficient alternative to address complex chemical reactions and interactions, particularly in high-temperature processes involving multicomponent systems and various operational parameters, where equilibrium is either local or global. This study applies computational thermodynamics to address challenges in producing high-N, low-Mn stainless steel in a scrap-based electric arc furnace route. It investigates the FeMnN addition to steel melt and explores potential causes of clogging in the nozzle and slide gate system during casting. Industrial measurements are incorporated to ensure the validity of the computational predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207