MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116106223 · doi:10.1016/j.jia.2025.12.033

Superoxide anion-induced ferritinophagy is involved in ferroptosis occurrence of cashmere goat sperm during cryopreservation

2025· article· en· W7116106223 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Agriculture · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperoxideSpermCryopreservationReactive oxygen speciesSemenProgrammed cell deathDownregulation and upregulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ferroptosis initiates at the cooling-equilibration phase, which is associated with the decreased levels of ferroptosis inhibitory proteins. The occurrence of ferroptosis during sperm cryopreservation is mediated by superoxide anions, and ferritinophagy is involved in this process. Ferroptosis is the primary form of regulated cell death in cashmere goat sperm during the freeze-thaw process, which significantly hinders the efficacy and application of frozen semen technology, yet its specific regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we found it activated during the cooling-equilibration phase, linked to the degradation of critical ferroptosis inhibitory proteins like ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1). Freezing causes superoxide anion accumulation via cytochrome b (CYTB) upregulation and reduced mitochondrial antioxidants, unblocked by ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1). Superoxide anions dose-dependently induce ferroptosis, mitigated by Fer-1. Autophagy/ferritinophagy inhibitors alleviate it, implicating ferritinophagy. This identifies superoxide anions as key mediators, offering new targets for sperm cryopreservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrative AgricultureSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207