MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116107553 · doi:10.82417/2w7g-p324

Exploiting the nonlinear deformation of mechanical metamaterials for engineering applications

2025· other· en· W7116107553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceMetamaterialNonlinear systemMechanical systemStiffnessFinite element methodCompliant mechanismVibration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive and responsive mechanical systems have significant potential in engineering applications requiring dynamic performance tuning. This work investigates a novel class of deformable mechanical metamaterials that leverage centrifugal forces to induce controlled structural transformations. Such materials exhibit nonlinear deformation characteristics, enabling passive adaptation to external loading conditions. We design a structure that integrates a flexible network of beams, capable of undergoing sudden geometric reconfiguration above a critical rotational speed. Using nonlinear finite element simulations, we demonstrate that under specific operating conditions, these beams collapse, resulting in a transformation of the system’s overall mechanical properties. By carefully controlling the design parameters, such as beam thickness, orientation, and relative density, we showcase the ability to modulate the effective stiffness and structural response of the material as a function of rotational speed. To validate our simulation results, we collaborate with the National Research Council of Canada to fabricate prototypes using additive manufacturing of composite materials. The findings of this study open new possibilities for rotating machinery, adaptive aerospace structures, energy absorption systems, and vibration control applications, offering a pathway toward the next generation of dynamically tunable mechanical systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207