MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116117781 · doi:10.82417/wnsz-cx21

Cyber-physical system architecture for real-time warehouse operations

2025· other· en· W7116117781 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTestbedProgrammable logic controllerArchitectureSystems architectureOpen architectureSynchronization (alternating current)Identification (biology)Cyber-physical systemExpert system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) combine computational and physical processes to enable real-time monitoring, control, and decision-making in industrial environments. This paper presents a CPS architecture designed for real-time warehouse operations within the Intelligent Cyber Physical Systems (I-CPS) laboratory testbed at Polytechnique Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The proposed CPS architecture follows the IEC 62264 standard and integrates standards-based industrial protocols to enable communication between components, including Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), Decision Theater for real time interactive decision making, Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR), Desktop Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine, Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID), proximity sensors, Quick-Response (QR) code reader, and camera vision system. Real-time data acquisition demonstrated a processing rate of 25 cycles per second (0.04 seconds per batch), supporting synchronization with a Digital Twin for operational monitoring. The proposed CPS architecture lays the foundation for addressing challenges in anomaly detection by introducing anomaly injection techniques as a future direction to mitigate the lack of naturally occurring anomalies. It contributes to the evolution of CPS architecture tailored for Industry 4.0 applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207