MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116120282 · doi:10.82417/bc54-zh35

Design of an adjustable-span test bench for studying fatigue of high-voltage clamp-conductor assemblies

2025· other· en· W7116120282 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConductorDisplacement (psychology)Electrical conductorVibrationFrettingTest benchPower (physics)Wire rope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) are used to transport high-voltage electric power across long distances. In use, those cables suffer from fretting fatigue caused by wind-induced vibrations. Resonance test benches often serve in laboratories to simulate field conditions and study wire failure. Electromagnetic shakers generate vibration loads on standardized conductor length of 7 m. For some laboratories, testing shorter conductor lengths would be more practical. However, it seems that the current literature offers no specification to realize valuable fatigue tests on shorter conductor lengths. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the validity of fatigue tests realized with shorter conductor lengths, and to design a new fatigue test bench allowing adjustable test lengths and conductors of various diameters. The study aims to demonstrate that tests made on shorter lengths can generate internal load conditions and damages at conductor critical positions equivalent to those produced under the standard framework imposed by the IEC62568:2015 standard. The official standard defines the test conditions and parameters such as the excitation frequency range and the displacement measurement positions along the Y longitudinal axis. For example, one of the positions is at 89 mm from the Last Point of Contact (LPC) between the clamp and the conductor. To achieve its goal, the proposed research should first establish the internal load conditions at the critical positions of a conductor tested under the standard framework. The main hypothesis is that equivalent displacement at the standard 89 mm position from LPC should result in equal stress distributions and damage at the strand critical positions. The adopted procedure evaluates these stress distributions via Finite Element Analysis (FEA). This first step validates the model through comparisons with experimental results found in the literature. The second step establishes the force and power required for an electromagnetic shaker to generate a chosen displacement at the standard 89 mm position on reduced cable lengths. This part also determines the stress distributions. The third step completes the design of the Adjustable Span Test Bench (ASTB). Finally, after fabrication of the ASTB, tests should be conducted on well-documented cable configurations, and the obtained experimental results compared with those available in the literature to validate the reduced length strategy put forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207