Identidades complejas y dinámicas. Redescubriendo el potencial hermenéutico de la filosofía política de Charles Taylor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we propose reconsidering from a hermeneutical approach the theme aboutidentity, which has been reactivated in the Quebecois debate about the “reasonable accom-modation”. For that aim, we deliberately adopt a hermeneutical view of Charles Taylor’spolitics. We start from his analyze about modernity where emerge the question about iden-tity and complementarily the recognition as a “struggle”. We explore the relationshipbetween authenticity and recognition. Then we go in depth in the link between individualand collective identity. How does Hermeneutics help to a better understanding about indi-vidual and collective identities? From the hermeneutic approach we focus on an accountof complex and dynamic identities and the possibility of “thinking and living deep diver-sity”. Finally, we answer to some of the criticism from procedural liberalism to CharlesTaylor’s politics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it